You know the moment. The model is done, the comps are tight, and now you need a merits and risks section that reads like a real investor document, not a stitched set of bullets. It has to be balanced, specific, and defensible. Most teams still draft this by hand. It eats an hour or more, then another pass to strip out marketing tone and get to PPM language. The hard part is not the ideas. It is putting them in a clean structure and stating risks without weakening the story. Marketing ~15 min to run Draft Investment Merits and Risks Narrative Vic prompt Use Vic to draft investment merits and risks for a commercial real estate deal from this deal summary. Purpose Delivers PPM-grade content ready for investor review. Replaces roughly 75 minutes of analyst drafting time with a 15-minute turnaround. Inputs Deal Summary Required Business Plan Optional Risk Context Optional Output Format Optional Brand Skill Or Assets Optional Outputs A Word document or slide deck with two clearly separated sections: investment merits and a candid risk-factors register with mitigants. Time saved Replaces roughly 75 minutes of analyst drafting time with a 15-minute turnaround. How it works Give Vic a deal summary and, if you have them, a business plan and any risk context you want included. You can also set the output format and any brand or style constraints. Then run: "Use Vic to draft investment merits and risks for a commercial real estate deal from this deal summary." Vic returns a Word document or slide deck with two separate sections. The first is investment merits . It lays out the upside around what investors expect: basis, demand drivers, value creation, downside protection, and sponsor alignment. The language is plain CRE, with numbers formatted the way you would show them in an OM or PPM. The second is a risk factors register with mitigants . It is direct and complete. Standard categories are covered, and each risk is paired with a specific mitigant so it reads like an underwriting discussion, not a disclaimer dump. The split helps. Investors can scan the upside, then assess risk on its own terms. This is not a generic paragraph generator. The structure stays consistent, but the content follows what you provide. If your deal summary leans on basis and mark to market, those come through as primary merits. If you include a business plan, the value creation section reflects it. If you pass risk context, it shows up in the register instead of sitting between the lines. The output is ready to drop into an offering memo or a PPM. Tone and level of detail fit investor review. If you need slides for a roadshow, ask for that format and you get the same sections arranged for presentation. There is a practical upside beyond speed. Writing merits and risks side by side forces discipline. It keeps the upside tied to supportable claims and stops the risk section from drifting into boilerplate. The result reads like it has been through an investment committee because it follows that logic. Use it when time is tight or when you want a clean first draft your team can edit instead of build from scratch. It turns a routine, fussy task into a quick pass you can review, adjust, and send.