You get the Phase I back and it is a wall of text. You need answers, not a reading assignment. Is there a Phase II? What are the real issues? What do we have to do next? Most teams still skim, flag, and rewrite the same summary for IC. It takes about an hour if you are careful. The risk is missing a REC buried in the narrative or soft language that can affect deal terms. Due Diligence ~5 min to run Create a Phase I Environmental Tear Sheet Vic prompt Use Vic to review the Phase I ESA for the property and generate the environmental tear sheet. Purpose Reduces manual review time from roughly 60 minutes to about 5 minutes and highlights the environmental issues that affect deal terms or require follow-up. Inputs Phase I Report Required Output Format Optional Additional Context Optional Outputs A one-page tear sheet with the Phase II verdict, environmental findings table, compliance obligations, two-line property overview, and up to three action items. Time saved Reduces manual review time from roughly 60 minutes to about 5 minutes. How it works Hand Vic the Phase I environmental site assessment. You can include an output format or extra context to match your house style, but it is optional. Then run: Use Vic to review the Phase I ESA for the property and generate the environmental tear sheet. Vic reads the report and returns a one page tear sheet. It opens with a two line property overview so anyone picking it up has context. The headline is the Phase II verdict. If the consultant calls for more investigation, it is stated plainly so the deal team can decide how to proceed. The center of the page is a findings table. It separates RECs, CRECs, HRECs, and de minimis conditions into a clean view instead of burying them in paragraphs. These categories carry different implications. You can see at a glance which items are active concerns versus conditions that were addressed or deemed minimal. Below the table are ongoing compliance obligations and next steps. This is where reports often hide practical requirements such as monitoring, reporting, or land use controls. Vic pulls those into a short list so asset management and legal know what carries forward after closing. The tear sheet ends with up to three action items. These are the immediate moves for the deal team: order a Phase II, request clarifications, or adjust diligence scope. The list stays tight so it drives action instead of becoming another memo. What you get back One page tear sheet Phase II verdict stated plainly Findings table for RECs, CRECs, HRECs, and de minimis conditions Compliance obligations that survive closing Two line property overview Up to three action items The value is speed and focus. You go from a 60 minute read to about 5 minutes with the same core facts on the page. The output is consistent across deals, which makes it easier to compare assets and keep IC discussions on issues that change pricing, structure, or timing. This is not a replacement for the full report. When something looks off, you still go back to the source. For day to day deal flow, a clean tear sheet keeps the team aligned and cuts out the repetitive rewrite that eats time during diligence.