Everyone says they review estoppels. In practice, they get skimmed because they look clean and come signed. The risk sits in the gaps between what the tenant certified and what the lease and addenda say. The painful part is not reading either document. It is lining them up term by term and deciding what matters. That is where mistakes slip through and later show up as pricing chips or post close headaches. Due Diligence ~5 min to run Reconcile Tenant Estoppel to Lease Vic prompt Use Vic to reconcile the executed estoppel for the tenant against its lease and all addenda. Purpose Surface hidden lease risks and quantify exposure before they affect underwriting or closing. Reduces review time from roughly 75 minutes to about 5 minutes per estoppel. Inputs Estoppel Certificate Required Lease File Required Lease Addenda Optional Output Format Optional Outputs A reconciliation report with a one-line verdict, total annualized exposure, discrepancies sorted by dollar impact, silent terms, and lease-economics summary, delivered in chat or as a Word file. Time saved Reduces review time from roughly 75 minutes to about 5 minutes per estoppel. How it works You upload the executed estoppel, the lease file, and any addenda you have. Vic reads them together and maps each material term into one of four buckets: Match, Discrepancy, Silent, or Not-in-lease. It then assigns a simple verdict for the package: Clean, Minor Issues, or Action Required. Run it with a single command: Use Vic to reconcile the executed estoppel for the tenant against its lease and all addenda. The output is built for decisions, not for a cover to cover read. You get a reconciliation report with a one line verdict and the total annualized dollar exposure tied to the issues found. Discrepancies are sorted by dollar impact so the biggest risks sit at the top. Each item includes the risk, the quantified impact, and clear next steps to resolve it. Vic also flags Silent terms, where the estoppel says nothing about a lease provision that could matter to underwriting or closing. It calls out Not-in-lease items, where the estoppel introduces a concept that does not appear in the lease documents. Both are common sources of confusion in diligence and negotiation. Alongside the issues list, you get a compact lease economics summary. It gives a quick read on the core numbers without flipping between PDFs. The full report can be delivered in chat or as a Word file, depending on how you need to share it with your team or counsel. The value is structure and prioritization. A standard review might catch obvious mismatches, but it rarely ranks them or ties them to dollars. Here, every discrepancy is paired with an annualized exposure so you can decide whether to push, price, or move on. This changes how estoppels get used in the deal process. Instead of a box to check, they become a quantified input to underwriting and a clear list for follow up before closing or renewal. If the verdict is Clean, you can move faster with confidence. If it is Action Required, you know where to focus and what to ask for. Five minutes is enough to get a structured answer that would usually take over an hour of careful comparison. The time savings is obvious. The more important gain is consistency. Every estoppel gets the same level of scrutiny, and the output reads the same way across tenants and deals. A signed estoppel is not proof that the lease economics are what you think they are. It is a statement that needs to be tested. This task runs that test and hands you the answer in a format you can act on.