You know the drill. A deal hits your inbox and the first hour goes to rebuilding the same DCF skeleton you built last week. Tabs, timing, sign conventions, returns panel. None of it moves the deal forward. The friction is not the math. It is the repetition. This task removes the setup so you can spend your time on assumptions, sensitivities, and whether the deal holds up. Underwriting ~10 min to run Build a Dynamic DCF Model Vic prompt Use Vic to build a 10-year DCF model for a commercial real estate acquisition with my deal inputs. Purpose You receive an institutional-quality model in 10 minutes instead of the 60 minutes a manual build typically requires, so you can move directly to sensitivity analysis and investment committee materials. Inputs Property Type Optional Model Type Optional Levered Optional Hold Period Years Optional Deal Inputs Optional Outputs A single .xlsx file containing the full multi-year DCF structure with separate unlevered and levered return calculations. Time saved Turns roughly an hour of manual work into about ten minutes. How it works You run a single command: Use Vic to build a 10-year DCF model for a commercial real estate acquisition with my deal inputs. You can add context like property type, hold period, or whether you want levered outputs. If you have T12s or a draft operating view, include them. If not, the model still arrives ready for your numbers. Vic returns one .xlsx file with a complete, multi-year DCF structure. The model covers Year 0 through the hold period and is organized into investment, operating, and reversion sections. It includes net unlevered and net levered cash flow lines and a returns panel with IRR, equity multiple, DSCR, and debt yield. This is not about fancy formatting. It gives you a clean, consistent base that takes your inputs without rework. Operating lines map to a standard chart of accounts so you can drop in T12 data and keep moving. The debt side includes amortization logic, so levered cash flow and coverage metrics are already wired. With the structure set, you can get to the work that matters. Test rent and expense growth. Adjust exit assumptions and see the effect on IRR and multiple. Check DSCR across the hold without building a separate schedule. If you need to present, the returns panel is already laid out for investment committee materials. This also helps on review. When a broker model comes in with unclear conventions, you can build a parallel DCF in minutes and pressure test the story. The same goes for internal handoffs. Everyone starts from the same base, which cuts down on reconciliation and avoids quiet errors that creep in during rebuilds. A template does not replace judgment. It removes the busywork so your judgment shows up earlier. For most teams, that is the difference between reacting to a deal and staying ahead of it.