You know the drill. New site, same scramble to pull nearby tenants, anchors, and traffic drivers, then drop pins and build a passable legend before the next call. It is repetitive work, and the output is rarely consistent across deals. The friction is not the thinking. It is the assembly. You are stitching together searches, screenshots, and a legend that someone else has to decipher later. Research ~6 min to run Map Points of Interest Around a Site Vic prompt Use Vic to map the points of interest around a proposed 45,000 sf retail site at 4500 Main Street, including competitors and traffic generators. Purpose A human analyst spends about 60 minutes on this work; the task completes in about 6 minutes. The output supports faster site comparison and competitive positioning analysis. Inputs Request Required Outputs An interactive map with a center point and numbered POI markers plus a linked, sortable legend that includes clickable names, addresses, and selected metrics. Time saved Turns roughly an hour of manual work into about six minutes. How it works Give Vic a site address or coordinates and tell it what to find. Keep it broad with competitors, anchors, traffic generators, and amenities, or pass a short list of POI types for a tighter cut. For example: "Use Vic to map the points of interest around a proposed 45,000 sf retail site at 4500 Main Street, including competitors and traffic generators." The task runs a curated Google Places search around the site and returns an interactive map centered on your location. Each point of interest is plotted with a numbered marker. The numbers matter. They link directly to a synced legend you can sort. The legend is where this turns practical. It lists the name and address for each POI with up to three data columns such as category, rating, or distance. Click a name and it jumps to the matching marker. Sort the list and the map stays in sync, so you can switch from proximity to category or rating without rebuilding anything. The output follows common institutional standards. It is clean, consistent, and easy to drop into a deck or share with a team. You are not handing off a screenshot that someone has to reinterpret. You are handing off a working map with a clear index. Because the inputs are simple, the task repeats well across deals. Use the same POI shortlist for a retail pipeline and you get comparable maps each time. That makes side by side site comparison faster and less subjective. It also cuts the back and forth when someone asks for a slightly different cut. Rerun with a refined list instead of starting over. Speed is the obvious win. A human analyst will spend about 60 minutes collecting, plotting, and formatting this. The task finishes in about 6 minutes. The quieter win is consistency. When every map uses the same structure and fields, your read on competitive positioning is clearer, and your team spends less time decoding each other’s work. This is a small task with a direct payoff. It clears a routine bottleneck and gives you a map you can trust and reuse.