You know the drill. You have a list of candidate sites and someone asks for traffic. Now you bounce between DOT portals, drop pins, copy AADT, and try to remember which station is closest to which parcel. It is slow and easy to get wrong. By the time you have a passable table, you still do not have a clear view of coverage gaps or how the sites compare. Sourcing ~8 min to run Map Traffic Counts for Candidate Sites Vic prompt Use Vic to map traffic counts for candidate sites from my address list. Purpose Traffic volume data directly informs rent projections and site viability during early screening. The task reduces the typical 75-minute manual process to about 8 minutes. Inputs Addresses Required Outputs An interactive map with subject sites and traffic stations plus a sortable table listing primary road, road class, AADT, count year, station distance, and nearby roads, with uncovered sites flagged. Time saved Turns roughly 75 minutes of manual work into about 8 minutes. How it works Give Vic a list of addresses. That is it. Run the command: "Use Vic to map traffic counts for candidate sites from my address list." Vic places each site on an interactive map and finds nearby DOT traffic count stations. The map uses color matched markers so each site and its stations are easy to track. You can scan a submarket and see which sites sit on higher volume corridors and which depend on weaker feeders without flipping between tabs. Next to the map, you get a sortable table that ranks up to 25 sites. The table includes primary road, road class, AADT, count year, station distance, and nearby roads. Sort by AADT to spot the clear winners, or by distance to see how far the nearest station sits from each site. Quality flags call out gaps. If a site lacks a nearby station, it is marked so you do not read too much into thin data. The count year is shown so stale counts do not slip into your rent assumptions. The output follows common institutional data viz standards and clean CRE number formatting, so it drops into your deck or IC memo without cleanup. No retyping. No rounding debates. The point is speed with clarity. Traffic volume feeds rent projections and basic site viability during early screening. This gets you from a raw address list to a defensible view in about eight minutes, versus roughly seventy five minutes by hand. More important, it makes comparisons obvious, which is what your team needs when the list gets cut.