You have a stack of offers and a seller on the phone asking which one is real. The PDFs do not line up. One buyer is strong on price and weak on certainty. Another is the reverse. You end up flipping between files, building a quick grid, and still arguing about what matters more. The friction is not reading offers. It is lining them up. Price, credits, timing, diligence, and execution risk show up in different formats. This task puts everything on one page and ties it to the seller’s priorities so you can make a call. Brokerage ~5 min to run Compare and Rank Offers on a Listing Vic prompt Use Vic to compare and rank the offers on my listing and recommend the counter terms. Purpose Sellers reach a documented decision faster and with clearer trade-offs. The process replaces roughly 30 minutes of manual comparison with a 5-minute run. Inputs Offers Required Seller Priority Optional Deal Context Optional In Place Noi Optional Output Format Optional Outputs An Excel or dashboard matrix with normalized terms, gross-to-net price bridges, and certainty scores, plus a one-page recommendation memo that identifies the target offer and the counter terms to propose. Time saved Turns roughly 30 minutes of manual work into about 5 minutes. How it works Hand Vic the offers you received. Add the seller’s priority if you have it, plus any deal context or in place NOI that frames value. You can also name an output format if you want Excel or a dashboard. Run it with a single line: Use Vic to compare and rank the offers on my listing and recommend the counter terms. Vic converts each LOI into a consistent set of fields. It builds a side by side matrix with price and key terms aligned. It then bridges gross price to a net effective number so concessions, credits, and timing sit next to price. It also scores execution certainty based on what is in the offers. The output has two parts. First, an Excel or dashboard matrix with normalized terms, gross to net bridges, and certainty scores. Second, a one page memo that ranks the offers against the seller’s stated priorities, names the offer to pursue, and spells out the terms to push in a counter or best and final round. What changes in practice You stop arguing from memory. The matrix forces clean comparisons, which most offer reviews lack. When price is adjusted to a net effective view, concessions and timing stop hiding in footnotes. Certainty is no longer a vibe. It is scored and visible next to economics. The recommendation memo gives you a clear position with the seller. It ties the pick to their priorities instead of a gut call in the moment. That makes the conversation faster and easier to document. If you go to best and final, you already have the terms to push. There is also a quieter benefit: consistency. Each deal uses the same structure, formatting, and definitions. Internal reviews run smoother and you avoid the rework that comes from everyone building their own sheet. What to include for best results Offers. Full LOIs or summaries. More detail leads to cleaner normalization. Seller priority. Price, certainty, timing, or a mix. If you skip this, the ranking will be generic. Deal context. Anything that changes how terms should be read. In place NOI. Useful for grounding value in the bridge. Output format. Excel if you plan to share and mark up. Dashboard if you want a quick read. The task replaces a manual half hour of building a comparison and arguing through it with a five minute run and a clear answer. More important, it makes the tradeoffs explicit. That is what sellers are asking for when they say, “Which one should we take?”