You know the drill. A new deal lands and someone has to drive the site just to answer basic questions about access, adjacencies, and whether anything looks off. Time you do not have gets eaten, and early calls slip. Then comes the write up. Notes are typed from memory, screenshots get pasted, and the comp context is uneven unless someone spends another block stitching it together. Due Diligence ~10 min to run Conduct Virtual Site Visit from Satellite Imagery Vic prompt Use Vic to conduct a virtual site visit on the subject property using satellite imagery, including comps if provided Purpose A physical site visit takes about 60 minutes of analyst time; this task completes the same review in about 10 minutes and supports faster screening before committing travel resources. Inputs Subject Property Required Property Type Required Output Format Required Comp List Optional Investment Context Optional Enrichment Optional Outputs An interactive map artifact plus a two-paragraph executive summary and a full site-visit memo with observations, red flags, and a comp comparison table when data is provided. Time saved Turns roughly an hour of manual work into about ten minutes. How it works Give Vic a subject property and the property type, then say how you want the output delivered. Add a comp list if you have one, plus any investment context or enrichment you care about. Run it with a single line: "Use Vic to conduct a virtual site visit on the subject property using satellite imagery, including comps if provided". The task reads satellite imagery from building scale out to the metro view. It outputs an interactive map with pins for the subject and any comps you supplied. The map follows common institutional visualization standards, so it is clean enough to drop into internal materials without rework. Alongside the map, Vic writes a property type specific site visit memo. It moves through observations by zoom level so you can see what is visible at the building, the immediate surroundings, and the broader area. It flags issues it can infer from imagery and records them in a consistent format. If you provided up to nine comps, the memo includes a comparison table so the subject sits in context instead of on its own. You also get a tight, two paragraph executive summary for quick reads. The full package can arrive in chat or as a Word document, branded to your standards if you plan to send it on. What to hand over Subject property and property type are required. Choose the output format, chat or Word. Optional comp list, up to nine. Optional investment context and any enrichment you want considered. What comes back An interactive map with subject and comp pins. A two paragraph executive summary. A full site visit memo with zoom by zoom observations, red flags, and a comp comparison table when comps are provided. The point is not to replace every site visit. It is to stop spending an hour to learn what you can screen in about ten minutes. You can triage more opportunities, decide which sites deserve a drive, and show up with a sharper list of questions. For teams juggling multiple looks at once, that alone changes the cadence of early diligence. There is a second benefit. The output is consistent. Different analysts notice different things on a drive and write them up in different ways. This task uses a property type checklist and a fixed structure, so your memos line up across deals. That makes internal discussions faster and keeps attention on the facts that matter for the asset you are evaluating. If you already keep a comp set, include it. Seeing the subject pinned against peers on the same map, with a table in the memo, cuts the back and forth that usually follows a first look. If you do not, run it without comps and add them on the next pass. The task handles both without changing your workflow.