You know the drill. Someone asks for exposure by market or sponsor and you start pulling commitments into a spreadsheet, building pivots, checking shares, then cross referencing mandate limits. It is easy to miss a concentration until it is already uncomfortable. This task skips that assembly work. It takes your commitments and returns a full exposure roll up, flags where you are over the line, and adds a short read on what is driving it. Asset Management ~10 min to run Build Portfolio Exposure View Vic prompt Use Vic to build a portfolio exposure view from my commitments. Purpose Reveals concentration risk before it affects returns or compliance. Replaces roughly 50 minutes of manual aggregation and limit checking. Inputs Commitments Required Mandate Optional Output Format Optional Outputs An Excel file or chat table with capital amounts, shares, and limit flags by five dimensions plus a short written assessment of portfolio balance. Time saved Replaces roughly 50 minutes of manual aggregation and limit checking with about 10 minutes. How it works Give Vic your commitments and, if you have it, your mandate limits. You can also name the output format. Then run: "Use Vic to build a portfolio exposure view from my commitments." Vic organizes the data across five dimensions that matter in allocation work: market, asset class, sponsor, strategy, and vintage. For each, you get committed and invested capital and percentage share. If you include a mandate, Vic checks each slice against the limits and flags any overages. The output comes back as an Excel file or a clean table in chat. It uses standard institutional formatting, so you can drop it into a memo or deck without cleanup. The structure is the same across all five views, which makes it easy to scan and compare where risk is building. There is also a short written assessment. It calls out overweights and underweights and points to the drivers. It is concise on purpose. You can see, for example, when sponsor concentration is creeping up even if market exposure looks fine, or when a recent vintage has taken a larger share than intended. The value is timing. You see concentration risk before it shows up in performance or compliance checks. That changes how you pace commitments and how you talk about the book with your IC. Teams use this in three moments. Before a new commitment, to see how it shifts exposure across the five dimensions. In periodic reporting, to keep a consistent view without rebuilding pivots each time. And when a question comes in from a CIO or board member and you need a defensible answer fast. If your commitments file is messy, that is fine. The task standardizes labels so "US East" and "East Coast" do not split your market view. You still control the definitions through your mandate. If you do not provide a mandate, you still get the roll ups and shares, just without limit flags. This replaces about 50 minutes of manual aggregation and limit checks with a run that finishes in about 10 minutes. More important, it cuts the small errors that creep in when you are rushing to answer a simple question that never seems to be simple.