You know the drill. A new address hits your desk and you open a dozen tabs, pan around satellite, check the block, then zoom out to see how the submarket fits. By the time you trust your view, an hour is gone and you still have to write it up. This task compresses that first pass into a single run. It reads the site from the building to the metro and returns a memo and a map you can use right away. Due Diligence ~10 min to run Conduct Virtual Site Visit Vic prompt Use Vic to conduct a virtual site visit on the subject property with property type and output format, including comps if provided. Purpose A human analyst needs about 60 minutes for the same review. This version finishes in about 10 minutes and supplies the map and memo in a format ready for reports or underwriting packages. Inputs Subject Property Required Property Type Required Output Format Required Comp List Optional Investment Context Optional Enrichment Optional Outputs An interactive map with subject and comp pins plus a two-paragraph executive summary. A site-visit memo with zoom-by-zoom observations, red flags, and a comparison table when comps are provided, delivered in chat or as a Word document. Time saved Turns roughly an hour of manual work into about ten minutes. How it works You give Vic the subject property, the property type, and your preferred output format. You can add a comp list of up to nine properties and any investment context you want in the writeup. The run line is simple: "Use Vic to conduct a virtual site visit on the subject property with property type and output format, including comps if provided." The task starts at the building and steps out through the immediate area, the neighborhood, and the metro. At each level it records observations tied to the property type. The checklists and demand drivers are specific to the asset class, so an industrial site gets a different read than a retail center or an office building. The output comes back in two parts. First, an interactive map with pins for the subject and any comps you included. It is handy for quick orientation and easy to share with a team. Second, a site visit memo you can drop into a report or underwriting package. It opens with a two paragraph executive summary, then the observations by zoom level, plus red flags where they appear. If you supplied comps, you also get a side by side comparison table in the same document. The format follows standard institutional conventions, so it reads like analyst work, not a rough note. If you need a file, it can be delivered as a Word document with clean branding. If you are moving fast, keep it in chat and pull sections as needed. This replaces the repetitive part of due diligence. Opening maps, checking access, scanning surrounding uses, and writing the same sections over and over. A human analyst needs about 60 minutes to do it carefully. This run finishes in about 10 minutes and leaves you with a map and a memo ready to use. Judgment still matters. You decide which flags matter and how to weight the comps. But you start from a consistent, documented read of the site across scales, which is where many first pass errors creep in. For teams, consistency is the point. Everyone gets the same structure, the same level of detail, and comparable output when comps are included. That makes reviews easier across deals and keeps the pipeline moving without losing the basics.