You open a PSA and the clock starts. The business terms look fine at a glance, but the risk sits in the details: contingencies, reps, remedies, and closing conditions that can move your basis or create exposure after close. Most teams still read line by line and build a punch list by hand. It takes about 45 minutes if you are fast, longer if the document is messy. This task cuts that to a tight read with a clear call and a fix list you can use. Due Diligence ~10 min to run Review a Purchase and Sale Agreement Vic prompt Use Vic to review the PSA for the 185,000 sf industrial building in Dallas and give me the sign/re-trade/walk call plus fixes for the key issues. Purpose Identifies terms that shift basis or create post-close exposure before you commit capital. A human review takes 45 minutes; this completes in 10. Inputs Purchase Sale Agreement Required Your Role Required Additional Context Optional Output Format Optional Outputs A one-line sign/re-trade/walk recommendation, a prioritized issues table with provision cites, risks, business problems, and fixes, plus a missing-protections list and standard disclaimer. Time saved Turns roughly 45 minutes of manual work into about 10 minutes. How it works Give Vic the purchase and sale agreement and your role on the deal. Add any context you have, such as timing, known issues, or sponsor preferences. If you care about format, say so. Otherwise you get a clean, standard output. Run it with a single line: Use Vic to review the PSA for the 185,000 sf industrial building in Dallas and give me the sign/re-trade/walk call plus fixes for the key issues. Vic reads the PSA from a buyer’s perspective and returns three items you can use right away. First, a one line call: sign, re-trade, or walk. No hedging. Second, a prioritized issues table that cites the provision, explains the risk, states the business problem, and proposes a fix. It focuses on the sections that matter in real deals: contingencies, reps and warranties, remedies, assignment, prorations, and closing conditions. Third, a list of missing protections with recommended language for each gap. The output uses plain CRE language. You can drop it into an internal memo or send it to counsel with clear direction on what to push. A standard disclaimer is included. What it catches that moves your basis The value is not a summary of the PSA. It pulls out terms that change economics or create tail risk. Weak or short diligence contingencies can force you to close without answers. Thin reps and warranties shift risk to the buyer. Remedy limits can cap recovery below the real downside. Assignment restrictions can block your capital plan. Proration mechanics can leave money on the table at closing. Closing conditions can let the seller cure late or avoid curing at all. The issues table ranks these points so you do not treat every comment the same. High impact items sit at the top with a clear fix. Lower impact items are still there, but they do not distract from the main negotiation. How teams use it in practice Acquisitions teams run this as soon as a draft hits the inbox. The one line call frames the internal discussion. If the call is re-trade, the table becomes the negotiation list. If it is walk, you have a documented rationale tied to specific provisions. Investment managers use it to keep multiple deals moving without losing consistency in review. Buyer side brokers use it to give clients a crisp read and a set of asks grounded in the document, not generalities. This does not replace legal counsel. It makes your first pass sharper and faster, and it gives counsel a focused brief on where to spend time. Ten minutes to reach a defensible position beats an hour of scattered notes. If your current process is a redline plus a long email, this is cleaner. You get a call, a ranked list, and fixes tied to the exact provisions. That is what moves a deal forward.